It is interesting to hear what major copper and aluminium producers have to say about copper to aluminium substitution.
From BHP Billiton ("copper remains a material of choice", "overall substitution remains small", "substitution has not significantly increased penetration"):
From Hydro ("copper substitution represents major potential", "aluminium has almost replaced copper in automotive precision tubing over last 30 years", "the leading position of copper in buildings has remained unchallenged ... until now"):
This is what DB has to say (presented at an ICSG meeting in April 2012) speaking from a copper industry point of view:
Black Rock's Cathrine Raw believes that substitution has already occurred:
Reuters echoed a similar narrative in their August 2011 article: "Copper's green appeal shields against substitution".“It’s now been fully substituted on the demand side. We’ve seen high copper prices for the past five years, and so in terms of substituting it for aluminum, all of that has occurred already. So unless there is a significant technological change on the demand side, there isn’t really a demand destruction you would expect if prices do raise.
Bloomberg Businessweek provides a balanced view of opinions in their February 2012 article: "Aluminium over copper for cables helps Rusal, Alcoa", citing both substitution bullish voices (such as Rusal and Alcoa) and substitution bearish opinions (such as the above cited ICSG/DB presentation). However, we disagree with the following paragraph:
Copper is at least 65 percent more effective than aluminum in three key properties: electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity and ductility, according to Deutsche Bank. This implies that copper should cost 1.65 times more than aluminum. When that ratio climbs to 2-to-1, an economic incentive to substitute copper with aluminum arises, according to the bank.
Street Authority's Nathan Slaughter states in his July 2012 article "one of the biggest opportunities in commodities since 1997" that
with aluminum rapidly replacing more and more copper every year, I believe prices will converge not by copper falling, but by aluminum rising. And there are several other factors at play that point to the exact same conclusion.Groven and Partners also shares the opinion in their July 2012 post "a copper caper" that substitution will play a role, but sees convergence of the copper aluminium price ratio through lower copper prices rather than higher aluminium prices.
Our basic idea is that the copper market is vulnerable because of (i) economic shocks from macro headwinds, (ii) substitution effects, (iii) a widespread and misplaced belief in Peak copper and (iii) structural changes in the copper market (financialization effects) that exaggerate demand.We also share the view Peak Copper is not an issue at the moment (i.e. for the next 10 to 20 years).
Finally Goran Djukanovic indicates in an article ("Aluminium versus copper – substitution on the way") in the April 2012 edition of the International Aluminium Journal (pp. 20-23) that:
There is no firm evidence that copper will be replaced by aluminium and alternative materials to an extent that would significantly influence future demand and result in lower prices. The prices of metals and materials (plastics, composites) that replace copper will also rise in future on increased demand, so limiting the extent of substitution and at the same time risking that these materials, in turn, may eventually be replaced.
